Internal Quality Audit
Management of the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) at the faculty and study program levels refers to the Decree of the Chancellor of Unud No. 1711/UN14.2/KP/2013, Decree of Chancellor of Udayana University No.16.01/UN14.2.2/PD/2018 and Decree of Chancellor of Udayana University No. 2592/UN14.2.2/PD/2018. At the faculty level, the management of SPMI is coordinated by the Learning Development and Quality Assurance Unit (UP3M), while at the study program level a Quality Assurance Implementation Team (TPPM) is formed.
SPMI implementation is carried out through the cycle of Determination, Implementation, Evaluation, Control, and Improvement (PPEPP) of Higher Education Standards (Dikti Standards). At the Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, 33 higher education standards have been developed consisting of nine education standards, eight research standards, eight service standards, eight special standards which include vision and mission standards, principal scientific pattern standards, FK identity standards, information systems/information technology standards, cooperation standards, ups and downs standards, student affairs standards and public relations standards. To evaluate all the standards that have been prepared, an Internal Quality Audit (AMI) is conducted annually by a team of certified auditors. The results of the audit findings are then discussed in the Management Review Meeting (RTM) or workshops at the faculty and study program levels to be followed up.
AMI in 2021 Lead auditor: Ir. Ida Bagus Wayan Gunam, MP., Ph.D. with 2 members of Unud's internal auditors, and 1 prospective auditor who is currently attending training as an internal auditor. The online field audit was carried out on July 9 2021. The activity was attended by Mr Wadek 1 (as well as giving remarks and opening the event), PSSKPD coordinator, UP3M Coordinator, TPPM Study Program, and persons in charge of activities at PSSKPD FK Unud. The activity began with clarification and confirmation regarding quality documents and the implementation of higher education tridarma at the study program level whether they are in accordance with the standards set by study programs, faculties, universities or by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The activity ended with the presentation of the findings by the internal auditor team and the formulation of a request for corrective action in accordance with the list of findings that had been agreed between the auditor and the auditee.
FACULTY OF MEDICINE UDAYANA UNIVERSITY